Process over reaction
Most mistakes don’t happen in hands.
They happen after. A few losing sessions - players adjust. Usually without data. They tighten up. Or force aggression. Both are reactions, not decisions.
I don’t change anything without evidence.
If the process is correct, results are irrelevant short term. Volume resolves variance. Review confirms direction.
Emotional adjustments create leaks.
Controlled adjustments fix them.
Simple question - when results shift, are you reacting or analysing?
Rate the blog:
Read also
If a new player asked me for advice, I’d give standard answers. Bankroll management. Study. Control tilt. But the real advice would be for the versi...
7
4
1240
Been thinking about something simple lately - does the table feel different when you know the players?When I’m playing with people I’ve known for a wh...
3
2
1361
Most players talk about big hands. Big bluffs. Big calls. They ignore volume. Tournaments aren’t won in one moment. They’re survived through routine. ...
8
2
1377
I like your cold & calculated approach. DO you have a process of exploiting other players in this way or are you namely talking about your own game and strategy. The meta game is interesting when you come accross other players that learn to adjust and of course the process is to continually update your beliefs and adjust accordingly. Good luck applying your strats to take down whatever hand your in.
Please, login or register.